31 Jul
2005
31 Jul
'05
8:51 a.m.
Last Saturday 30 July 2005 18:01, Jan Depner was like:
On Sat, 2005-07-30 at 16:04, hanaghan(a)starband.net
wrote:
> I want to know
> what makes you spend the time you do on this stuff so guys like me can
> pilfer legally and freely your hard works and then subsequently bitch at
> random about how it doesn't work! :)
I understand the tongue in cheek-ness of this remark, but I think you've
muddied the waters by using this analogy.
One of the reasons that I started working on JAMin
with Steve, Jack,
et al is that I was using Ardour. I had tried to contribute to Ardour
at first but it was too far along in development for me to jump in and
easily get acclimated. I didn't have the time to spend to get up to
speed. I felt that I owed something back to the community (and Paul in
particular) for the work that had gone in to the applications that I was
able to "pilfer legally and freely". As far as playing nicely together
is concerned, that's why we used JACK. JAMin was actually designed to
be the mastering backend to Ardour. I have to admit that once I got
started working on JAMin it was a hell of a lot of fun ;-) It seems to
me that some of the best ideas come from those who "bitch at random".
JAMin is a good example. I'm really impressed with the way it was developed
collaboratively, starting from a discussion here & on LAD AFAIU. I like the
fact that it's not a drop-in replacement for anything I've ever seen before
(my experience of music software outside Linux is limited) I like what it
does, the way it does it and I LOVE the way it looks. In fact, the only thing
I don't like is its heavy use of resources on this machine, but I suspect
that's a direct result of the sort of processing involved and I'm not
expecting that to change. Soon I will own a computer that was made this
century. Describing yourselves as those who "bitch at random" is
self-deprecating to say the least. I'd like to see more projects happen this
way.
cheers,
tim hall
http://glastonburymusic.org.uk