5 Nov
2016
5 Nov
'16
1:45 a.m.
i'm just wondering why you'd bother to set HZ when the preferred
configuration is NO_HZ .. ?
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:51 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc(a)rncbc.org> wrote:
On 11/04/2016 09:24 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 3:30 PM, Rui Nuno Capela <rncbc(a)rncbc.org
<mailto:rncbc@rncbc.org>> wrote:
echo "CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_FULL=y" >> .config
echo "CONFIG_HZ_1000=y" >> .config
surely a tickless kernel is much better on almost any vaguely modern
hardware?
none of the above abstains you from a tickless kernel
CONFIG_NO_HZ and CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE are untouched, as far as `make
oldconfig` goes
cheers
--
rncbc aka. Rui Nuno Capela