19 Feb
2012
19 Feb
'12
10:04 p.m.
Hi Yosef,
If your recording to disk bandwidth becomes important when you're doing
lots of I/O. For recording a couple of channels I wouldn't worry about 5400
rpm, but if your doing 24 tracks at a high sampling rate, then your disks
bandwidth may become an issue.
Remember that HDR applications like Ardour do have a buffer of couple of
seconds, so your disk access can lag once in a while so long as the
troughput is fast enough to keep up. I wouldn't go with 72000 for the
access times, it won't make a significant impact. I'd sooner concider doing
some sort of soft-RAID to spread the load between two disks :)
HTH, -Harry
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Yosef Werner <yw.werner(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
for testing reasons I've installed Arch-Linux on a second HD with 5400
rpm. The recording and production is on the first HD with 7200 rpm,
openSuSE 10.2 and kernel-rt. After some work with Arch-Linux it seems that
it could be the next platform for the DAW. My question is if a HD-7200 rpm
is also necessary for the system to prevent x-runs? For sure, the HD-7200
rpm is mounted for recording.
Thanks for sharing your knowledge,
Yosef
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user