4 Oct
2007
4 Oct
'07
8:27 a.m.
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:29:56AM +0200, Florian Schmidt wrote:
[...]
And yes, i consider it a bug that top and other software report the SCHED_FIFO
prio as negative values. Where does that come from? Does the prio already get
listed as negative in /proc? Or do they simply do it to separate the
SCHED_FIFO threads from SCHED_OTHER threads? Anyways POSIX speaks of positive
SCHED_FIFO prios in the range 1..99 afaik..
Hmmm, POSIX talks about priorities in the range of
min .. max,
where
min = sched_get_priority_min(alg)
max = sched_get_priority_max(alg)
max - min >= 32, if alg == SCHED_FIFO or alg == SCHED_RR
and alg being the the scheduling algorithm (like SCHED_FIFO, ...)
Under Linux (according to 'man sched_get_priority_min') the follwoing
ranges apply:
SCHED_FIFO : min = 1, max = 99
SCHED_RR : min = 1, max = 99
SCHED_OTHER : min = 0, max = 0
jm5c,
Yours,
Jacob
I get visible xruns but not audible so far. I am
guessing I have the wrong
buffer sizes between Pd, Csound, and jackd...
No, i don't think so. If you use Pd and CSound as jack apps, then jack tells
them what buffer size to use. If one of these used the wrong size you would
definitely hear it..
Start jack and run this script and tell us the output please:
http://tapas.affenbande.org/rt-setup-report.sh
Thanks,
Flo
--
Palimm Palimm!
http://tapas.affenbande.org
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user