24 May
2006
24 May
'06
1:29 a.m.
On 5/24/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/24/06, Wolfgang Woehl <tito(a)rumford.de>
wrote:
Aaron thanks, I'll try that. You happen to know whether this is a motherboard
in 64 bit? What mobo? I've given up on ingo's patches on my 64 bit machine here.
Tuesday 23 May 2006 12:25, Aaron Krister
Johnson:
> On Wednesday 24 May 2006 8:28 am, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
> > Got 2.6.16.16 from kernel.org. If I understood Lee right I could
expect
a
> > jackd with -p 64 -n 2 to work just fine
but it doesn't. Loads of
xruns.
What am I missing? What can I do to find out?
Hi Wolfgang,
I was banging my head against the wall with the same issue, but after a
*long* Google search, I found that disabling acpi did the trick for me. issue or is kernel's acpi just not there yet?
What a shame, it's such a
good
thing to save power :)
--
Wolfgang
Hi,
I'm just echoing Lee's inputs as someone who's been down the low
latency path for a while now. I am currently using 2.6.16-gentoo-r2
with no low latency patches. It works fine on my AMD64 hardware, at
least for low work load low latency needs. I run at 64/2 on my HDSP
9652 and get no xruns doing mostly mixing and a very little recording.
However I do require realtime-lsm be enabled and loaded. Without
realtime-lsm all kernels on my machine, with or without Ingo's
patches, cause xruns.
I have not tried the pam enabled realtime methods as there doesn't
seem to be any value spending the time to do it just yet.
Cheers,
Mark