22 Jun
2009
22 Jun
'09
12:26 p.m.
Den Monday 22 June 2009 15.24.42 skrev Fons Adriaensen:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 02:51:53PM +0200, Bengt Gördén
wrote:
Absolutely. We have a sender and a receiver. I was arguing about this from the
sending side not caring about the receiver.
Well. Lets agree that you thinks he's being prophetic and I thinks he's
dyspeptic and if I ever get to LAC we can debate whether he is or not, over a
nice cold pilsner. Czech or American style depending on if I need to cure an
emerging dyspepsia or not. :-)
regards,
/bengan
Den Monday 22 June 2009 14.35.19 skrev Fons
Adriaensen:
He's not saying that musical creation should be restricted to a
small number of predetermined people. But de facto, like all
artistic endeavour, it is a minority activity, We may all be
potential great composers or artists, but most of us do not
exploit that potential, just look around. Maybe 10% of the
population is capable of producing anything that would be
regarded by the remaining 90% as music they'd want to listen to.
Less than 1% could do something that would survive a generation
and become part of music history, On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 05:00:26AM -0700, Mark
Knecht wrote:
On the other hand he is wrong about musical creation being restricted to
a certain number of people so I vote for him being just dyspeptic. I vote mostly prophetic.
Given that this was written in the early 50s, it is quite
prophetic.