21 Dec
2010
21 Dec
'10
12:55 p.m.
Le 21/12/2010 12:47, Jörn Nettingsmeier a écrit :
On 12/21/2010 04:50 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
+1
Fred
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Ray
Rashif<schivmeister(a)gmail.com> wrote:
i agree. but paul, there could be one benefit to distribution
build-scripts: if they track the dependencies, they make it very easy to
pull in all the required third-party libraries for a3.
that is, they remove a major hurdle for a casual tester that doesn't
want to jump through too many hoops to have a look at ardour, and who is
capable of dealing with pre-release software and the required debugging
procedure.
(need to upgrade my main studio machine soon, and boy do i wish for an
a3-build-requirements meta package...)
On 21 December 2010 10:55, Paul
Davis<paul(a)linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
right. and that's the whole point. i don't want people who
"just want
to try it" to do so at this point because i don't believe its ready
for them.
there were 16 commits to svn within the last 20
hours. some of these
were deep changes to the way things work (though hopefully not
resulting in any visible breakage, we don't know, which is why its not
released yet). do you really think that arch linux users who are using
a pkgbuild to try this out have any grasp of what is going on?
maybe the answer, your answer, is "yes". i'm quite a bit more skeptical.
I'd be as skeptical as you, if that's the question. There are
bound to
be those who just want to "try" ardour3.
best,
jörn
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user