Re: [LAU] digital voodoo: master fader should be set at 0db

On 15 April 2010 07:33, Ray Rashif <schivmeister(a)gmail.com> wrote: s/to// :: addition of frequencies 20kHz to those below that range and Now, with regards to the violin scenario, we all know that that is close to unattainable at this point of time due to technical limitations - mainly hardware (I assume we are referring to digital reproduction). You have to admit, even if not from experience, but from a theoretical standpoint, that there are or should be noticeable differences between a live and recorded analogue signal (if it's a music band/track; anything else is voodoo). The live one sounds like crap. How much you can capture to reproduce has and will always depend on the tool(s) used for the capturing. And as I see it, Physical Modelling is one workaround in the digital domain, such that in the future (if it will still be called "Physical Modelling"), it apparently "should" surpass transducers with the help of computing prowess. I don't find that hard to believe, because people are already "printing" physical 3-dimensional objects from virtual images. Not a good analogy, but you get it. -- GPG/PGP ID: B42DDCAD