On Fri, 17 Mar, 2006 at 06:31PM +0100, Thorsten Wilms spake thus:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0200, Juhana
Sadeharju wrote:
BTW, sorry about the "sucks" but that was honest on my part. I'm comparing
to Madonna, Yello etc. Check a couple of Yello loop sets for the
excellent sound quality at
http://www.funet.fi/~kouhia/mountedbythegods.tar.bz2
http://www.funet.fi/~kouhia/startabcontest2004.tar.gz
_Many_ things suck if put next to Yello.
Now this could be interpreted like you think that CD sucks
because it lacks in sound quality. Now is that what you mean?
Try being specific, damnit.
Maybe the Yello guys do not have "only" skills and many years
of experience, but also the best equipment? I don't see
online collaborations helping on, of all aspects, "sound
quality". Exchanging 32 bit float wavs over the net?
I'd love to get my grubby hands on some serious equipment - mainly
because of the potentiometer fetish I seem to have developed.
But at the same time, I'm all for making the most of what you have.
If you can only manage low fidelity (whatever fidelity means when,
like me, you rarely touch a "real" instrument), then bloody well stick
the lo-fi badge on it and go with it.
Windows users are probably perfectly suited to making glitch music,
for example ;)
James
Thorsten Wilms
--
"I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated
Development
That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you."
(By Vance Petree, Virginia Power)