13 Jul
2008
13 Jul
'08
9:34 p.m.
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 4:22 PM, Loki Davison <loki.davison(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 1:22 AM, Dave Phillips
<dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> wrote:
I agree completely with everything Loki says. It's all perfectly
correct. Whether your eyes see the difference is based on the quality
of your eyes. Ears are FAR more sensitive. My eyes are very old and
quite blurry looking even at real life. It hardly matters to me what
the quality of my screen is after the second beer. ;-)
Cherrio,
Mark
Hey Mark,
I forgot to mention that I'm running it with the VGA connection. Should
I line myself up against the wall now ? ;)
Actually, thanks to Loki's remarks I'm kind of interested in the DVI
now. My video card has the output, but I need a cable. Is there any
other special consideration to make when going DVI ?
Best,
dp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Well, it automagically does everything for you with size, location etc
then which is nice, and it is clearer. Also a dvi cable costs $5 so
it's not a big issue. It is nicer. No setup is required as it's the
standard way to do it now days. Remember that HDMI and DVI have
nothing in common. Lots of people keep mentioning HDMI which is the
weird arse encrypyed dodgy one. :) Try both and tell me if you can
see the difference. With cards/screens i've tried it's a pretty huge
difference but i'm not sure if some of the guys using VGA connectors
have A/Bed. Audio guys should know that extra ad/da for no reason is a
bad thing.
Loki