On November 16, 2017 4:52:10 PM HST, Len Ovens <len(a)ovenwerks.net> wrote:
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017, David W. Jones wrote:
Well, when I made an attempt to use Ardour, I
quickly figured out
that
its design assumed I was a fluent user of a
traditional hardware
mixer
and an experienced sound tech/engineer ... but
I'm no music pro, so
could just be me.
At the same time, I handled the physical tasks of connecting cables
between modules on a Moog ages ago, so maybe Ardour needs a more
physical UI? ;)
If you don't want to hire an engineer, I am guessing you need to do
their
job. Just as with physical mixers and tape machines, someone needs to
decide which physical input goes to which channel, what level and Eq
that
signal has, etc. etc.
I guess there are some artists like the famous opra singer who
announced
that she did not _need_ a microphone as her voice was loud enough
already,
thank you. So she was recorded with the live mic sitting off to the
side... by a hired engineer.
I can not think of any Daw or Daw like sw that does not expect at
least
some "plugging in" or routing to be done.
and yes, Ardour can be run quite well with a physical UI. Be it a
keyboard
with black and white keys, a control surface with faders (physical or
touch), a keyboard with letters and numbers on it... or even a strange
small box with two buttons and a wire (or not) that you slide around
on
your desk. It seems some people are willing to spend extra money so
they
can have one of each.
Everything has a learning curve, a piano keyboard is not really
intuitive,
nor the keys of a sax... the trombone might be more such, but a not a
trumpet for sure. The more versatile the instrument, the steeper the
learning curve.
Even with a simple Daw, you have to plug the mic in somewhere.
So I fail to see your point, it seems to be "thats not good" but not
"compare this to that" or "this way would be easier". The average
amplifier made for someone's living room still has an input selector
for
routing (after the user has physically plugged in all the cords), an
eq
section (treble and bass... or more), a balance control and a level
control... pretty much like each channel in a mixer.
My audio originates from soft synths driven by Rosegarden, melody input via MIDI to RG. If
I was multitracking a pile of external audio sources like guitars and mics, I'd use
Ardour.
What Ralf thinks about it is Ralf's opinion, not mine.
Jeez, people. I'm not against Ardour as it currently is, nor demanding it be
'dumbed down'. So can we all just get along?
--
David W. Jones
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community