23 May
2006
23 May
'06
10:40 p.m.
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 17:35 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
We went through this before. I'm just being a
grouse. PAM-0.99.3.0 is
masked in portage right now meaning it hasn't been completely tested,
etc. It's easy enough to unmask, but why should I bother? I feel no
need to be an early adopter in this area. When the Gentoo devs unmask
pam then I'll consider it, but why now? Will it give me any fewer
xruns than I'm getting with realtime-lsm? It cannot. I'm at zero right
now.
OK, thanks for clarifying this. My understanding of masking, unmasking,
etc in Gentoo was incomplete :-)