18 Nov
2005
18 Nov
'05
8:30 a.m.
Pete Leigh wrote:
On 18/11/05, Clemens Ladisch <clemens(a)ladisch.de>
wrote:
So latency doesn't improve over USB 2.0? That's interesting.
Thanks.
c.
USB 2.0 uses 8000 microframes per second, but EHCI
don't interrupt more often
than once per millisecond by default, so it doesn't make a difference.
[and much other useful and clear information]
Thanks, Clemens! I think I might just take my chances on the UR-80, so
make sure your "please show the lsusb -v output for this device" keyboard
macro is up and running ;-)
Seriously, thanks for your input - much appreciated.
- Pete.