30 Jul
2004
30 Jul
'04
3:03 p.m.
On Friday 30 July 2004 04:07 am, Steve Harris wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 08:46:42 -0400, John Check
wrote:
It is far from the only reason for DSSI's existence.
I'm having a look at the RFC...
I only know of DSSI because a couple of the MusE guys wanted to integrate it
and got shot down.
* Low
latency realtime operation via Jack
* 100% LADSPA plugins, not Yet Another Internal Plugin Format
- (DSSI and perhaps VST are being considered)
FWIW DSSI as a response to MusE softsynth handling API dependency QT is
fallacious. There is no dependency according to Werner Schweer. Just
saying. - Steve
PS to list at large
FYI: I'm completely ignorant of the current linux audio scene, but I've been
around as a developer on the platform. I have a music/audio background and
I'm "getting back to my roots" for the next phase.
A few more clue-impaired statements are likely while I'm ramping up.
If I say or miss anything that should be "obvious", clue me. I intend to take
on some of the documentation issues as part of my larger strategy.