24 May
2008
24 May
'08
5:02 p.m.
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 8:03 AM, Michal Seta <mis(a)artengine.ca> wrote:
I used lush years ago for some algorithmic image generation. I
remember having some complaints about the incompatible compilable and
non-compilable languages that are embeddable in the same source file,
but I was less skilled a programmer then. I think I may try making
some lush jack bindings this weekend, just to see how it works out,
because jack is a tiny api and lush hits a sweet spot for me in a few
ways, being a lisp, easy to use at a low level, compilable to shared
libraries and able to use c shared libraries with little trouble. A
lush library for generating LV2, LADSPA, or DSSI would be interesting,
as well.
On Fri, May
23, 2008 at 5:17 AM, Dave Phillips <dlphillips(a)woh.rr.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> As I explore AVSynthesis I've been looking for similar applications and
> environments. I'm already familiar with the Pd/GEM powerhouse combo, but
> I keep searching for others.
lush? http://lush.sourceforge.net/
I toyed with it a little and it seems like a fairly powerful piece of
software. Uses it's own lisp dialect. I haven't done any real tests
but on some more or less simple thingies it outperforms processing.
It has bindings for opengl, sdl, opencv and a bunch of other
mathematical/scientific and image/matrix processing libraries. There
are even alsa bindings and perhaps it wouldn't be too difficult (for
someone in the know) to add jack. The thing is that it's quite
low-level so there are not many ready-to-go routines for image
processing (unless I missed some piece of information somewhere). I
think that the software is still being slowly maintained/updated but
at a very slow pace (haven't really followed in a long while).
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Justin Smith <noisesmith(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Processing is interesting. I found it to be
frustratingly slow,
Has anyone compared processing with pygame (performance wise especially?)