Hi,
This has my vote for LAU post of the year - the subject says it all. As
someone who dabbles in Linux audio but usually gets frustrated by the
apparently endless minor hassles of getting things working, I found this
enormously encouraging. Also the notes on what you actually use, and for
what, are very helpful. I was so enthused that I tried out Aeolus and
had an absolute ball playing with it - what an awesome sound! Please
post more about how you work.
Fritz
alex stone wrote:
I thought i'd add a quick note here, from the
perspective of a
classical music writer, as to the success of mostly latest builds of
various tools i use.
A big part of frustrating challenges with a former life in win/mac has
been the general lack of resource for ports, channels, etc.. For
orchestral writing, we're dealing in large numbers that are often not
even thought of, or within the mindset of commercial developers.
Step in Linux, and those that know me will also be aware of my now ten
months worth of enthusiasm and determination to take advantage of the
new perspective that linux and it's audio tools offers.
...........
..........
This is a bit of a watercooler moment for me, and i apologise if
there's no real constructive content in here, but i've got a lot of
music written recently, and in a moment of reflection, i realised how
enjoyable it's been not having to constantly readjust, or revive,
twitchy apps, that don't do what they say on the tin. All of the above
programmes do, and that's a bottom line for me. Among all you
'rockers', i feel like a bit of a odd man out, and appreciate my
requirements are quite a bit different, on occasion. :) , but we have
a common goal in more writing, and less tweaking or fixing.
So thanks to you all. I know and read you fellas get involved in the
mechanics of app progress, at a level beyond me. But from an ordinary
user's perspective, i've never found the writing process more
enjoyable. I also understand you're constantly improving, updating,
questioning, and discussing your work, often enthusiastically and
determinedly, but from the other side of the fence, the benefits are
apparent, and profound to chaps like me. I look foward to seeing what
you come up with next. (Ardour3, RG QT4, LS plugin and new engine
development, further acceptance and development of LV2, a real and
viable opensource sample format, etc....)
I will bluntly defy anyone who dares to suggest that linux audio isn't
up to a robust full time challenge as a viable, and in many cases,
better alternative to the commercial apps/distros. With a bit of
effort on the part of the user (and maybe this is the real
difference), the rewards are formidable, and enjoyable. And if a
potential new user makes a decision on whether to take on linux, based
purely on appearance, well, to be frank, i've kissed a few slightly
less attractive women in my time, and their performance hasn't
suffered at all.
My regards, and continued appreciation of the efforts you make, for
our benefit,
Alex Stone.
p.s. It's Dave Griffiths fault i got mixed up in Linux in the first
place, so blame him. Thanks Dave. :) , it's been more than worth it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG -
http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1679 - Release Date: 9/18/2008 5:03 PM