27 Jun
2011
27 Jun
'11
10:09 a.m.
Am 25.06.2011 18:40, schrieb rosea.grammostola:
On 06/25/2011 06:36 PM, david wrote:
a lot. On Ubuntu it uses twice as much as Gnome2, on Fedora it is similar.
BUT: it can be configured to work very streamlined. On Suse 11.2 I only
disabeled the 3d-effects and the indexing and downloaded a lighter
Theme. Now it feels like XFCE in terms of performance.
I also have zero trouble using Dolphin or Konqueror or Kate under XFCE
in Fedora. As of now I have Mozilla, Dolphin and Jack and MHW up and
running in XFCE/Fedora14 and it uses 410MB memory.
Quite OK on a box with 2GB RAM.
btw.: here on my Thinkpad I have only but 2GB installed since I do not
feel the need to have much more. I can edit Ardour-Projects with around
40-50 channels and dozens of plug ins and record from guitarix at the
same time.
rosea grammostola wrote:
Wow! Yeah, the points that made us proud of Linux slowly seems to fade
away... :( These new Desktop developments doesn't seems to be good for
Linuxaudio users at all...
Btw do you know what KDE4 uses? So guys, just upgrade Gnome2 to Gnome3? ... Is it
true that both
Gnome-shell and Unity needs Pulseaudio?
I don't know about that. I know that Gnome3 uses 1GB of memory ... One dev told that it would be lighter
then KDE3 when KDE4 was released.
My
wife's new netbook has Ubuntu 11.04 on it,
haven't noticed if it's using
PA or not, but sound works.
Ok, Ubuntu uses Unity. Do you know how Unity compares
to Gnome-shell
when it comes to system resources?
\r
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user