8 Dec
2005
8 Dec
'05
10:42 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 21:22 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 18:25 -0500, Lee Revell wrote:
In CVS a while back, I suppose. AFAIK all 0.3.x (x >= 1) tarballs have
the same non-GPL license.
-- Fernando
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 14:43 -0800, Mark Knecht
wrote:
AFAIK, it has nothing whatsoever to do with a patent issue. That
question does exist for LS, but I do not believe (and I am not certain
here) that it is related to the reason for the license change in CVS. Anyone intersted in further study could easily
discover the U.S.
patent numbers that were originally licensed to NemeSys. (Not Tascam!)
If someone cannot do that for themselves then they probably could
figure out someone who does know the numbers and ask so they could
read the patents for themselves.
Please note that while I am greatly disappointed that all of this has
happened I still thinkLS is a really great piece of work and I, for
one, still have great respect for all the folks that have done this
work.
If the issue really is a patent dispute involving a patent that is 1) a