On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 02:57:01PM -0400, John Check wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2004 04:20 pm, Lee Revell
wrote:
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 14:24, David Baron wrote:
On Thursday 09 September 2004 19:00,
linux-audio-user-request(a)music.columbia.edu wrote:
Go for it. i would definetly like to save the
extra step of compiling
the realtime lsm each time i upgrade my kernel.. And i think it might
prove useful even for non audio users.. Often security stuff likes to
mlock small portions of memory, too, etc..
Yes, except that the realtime-lsm
precompiled binary is not updated on
Sid each time the kernel is. The only way to keep it current is to
compile it yourself. Compiles quickly and reliably--just remember to copy
the .ko to the correct place and then reboot.
This is why we want realtime-lsm to
be part of the kernel, because it
_would_ automatically get upgraded when you upgraded your kernel. Since
Are you
sure? ALSA isn't always current.
The thing is that even if there weren't a new version of the lsm, there
would at least be a build that matched the symbols of the kernel
version. The problem isn't so much keeping the version of the
realtime-lsm in sink as it is having a version that's compiled to match
the kernel version.
Even with alsa drivers, if you build the most reason version outside the
kernel tree, you have to recompile everytime you recompile your kernel.
maybe you could get around this by turning off versioned symbols in your
kernel ... but, I get the impression things can get messy that way. I
don't entirely grok what I'm talking about .. but, I've generally
understood it to be better to not try to mix modules compiled against
a given kernel with other kernels.
-Eric Rz.