11 Nov
2008
11 Nov
'08
6:32 p.m.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:12 AM, Emanuel Rumpf <xbran(a)web.de> wrote:
2008/11/11 Damon Chaplin
<damon(a)karuna.eclipse.co.uk>uk>:
One word of warning, Khagan hasn't been worked on in years and really
isn't any good. :) It was my first python app and the code is
horrible. Ingen's internal gui's are really everything you want as
far as control goes. It's much more useful to set up a good midi
binding than make a gui with lots of knobs. Much more usable. Ingen
really is very nice, i've made some very complex patches with it and
using the sub patches / etc you can present only the useful controls
to the user. It really is the way to go. I tried the other option, for
my drum synth project, Smack and found the gui irrelevant. I
originally wrote one in c and then did it using Khagan. Both are less
usable than the in built gui system in Ingen. Learn from my mistakes!
:)
Loki
Yes, I was looking at Ingen earlier today. I may
be wrong, but I don't
think you can create synth-like GUIs with it (with knobs/sliders etc.).
One idea is - to controll the synths with
a separated gui through OSC commands.
(separated engine & gui)
A simple gui creator is khagan:
http://khagan.berlios.de/
By using OSC you can use the GUI-toolkit you prefere for the user interface.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user