20 Apr
2008
20 Apr
'08
8:32 a.m.
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008 11:36:15 +0200
Fons Adriaensen <fons(a)kokkinizita.net> wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 06:37:21PM -0400, nescivi
wrote:
No don't ! The procrastination processor is probably stack based.
Ciao,
I disagree. It must be a circular buffer. Stack based could overflow
and crash. A circular buffer never stops :)
--
Will J Godfrey
http://www.musically.me.uk
ah, is it
simply because there is this one developer here who suffers from
some form of chronic procrastination ? :)
so we need to find another feature request or bug so you can fix this one,
while procrastinating the other? ;)