Re: [LAU] How to disable Ardour's phone home option?

Robin Gareus <robin(a)gareus.org> writes: [...] True -- I'd probably be digressing from Linux Audio to get into this, but I think the most privacy-invading thing on any modern desktop is any "thick" browsers like Firefox or Chrom(ium) that support AJAX, JavaScript, video-in-a-browser, and the whole nine yards that we've come to expect as part of our World Wide Web experience. (Basically, if it's fully functional on Facebook, it's "thick" enough for what I'm talking about.) Heavy browsers like this are basically poorly written OS's that run under your real OS desktop as an application. They have full read/write access to every file in your home directory, can launch their own programs, install their own packages, and have enough C++ code to hide elephants and giraffes. Heck, you can play video games inside them. In some cases, they may actually be bigger than your real OS. (These days, Firefox is enormous.) People used to complain that Emacs, as text editors go, was a rediculous monstrosity, because it featured basically a whole OS with a package system and an interpreted language inside your editor. Compared to Firefox and Chrome, Emacs is a well written, well behaved, very secure environment that uses very little memory and plays well with everything. Shows how far down the toilet we've gone that we can now say that about "Eight-Megs-Always-Constantly-Swapping" Emacs, and yearn for the days of its relative secure efficiency. When you browse the Internet with a heavy browser though, you take your life in your own hands, and most of us do it several times every day on our "secure" Linux desktops. That's the real exploitation path for most users. They don't need your root password. They don't need an obscure buffer overflow in some library you never think about. They just need you surfing the web in your big-as-a-whale web browser. -- + Brent A. Busby + "We've all heard that a million monkeys + Sr. UNIX Systems Admin + banging on a million typewriters will + University of Chicago + eventually reproduce the entire works of + James Franck Institute + Shakespeare. Now, thanks to the Internet, + Materials Research Ctr + we know this is not true." -Robert Wilensky