17 Feb
2013
17 Feb
'13
9:58 p.m.
On 02/17/2013 09:52 PM, drew Roberts wrote:
On Sunday 17 February 2013 11:49:06 Joe Hartley
wrote:
All "replies" should to the sender only. The lists.linuxaudio.org does
not munge the headers. It's up to you and your MUA.
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:36:46 +0800
Simon Wise <simonzwise(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nor mally, a simple reply works for me but for some posts, a reply just goes
back to the sender. On 18/02/13 00:22, Len Ovens wrote:
It's not so much the mail client as the list settings and the headers it
adds to the email (though some clients are broken with regards to this).
For me, using the Sylpheed client, a simple reply comes back to the list,
while a reply-all goes to the sender with a cc: to the list, which would
cause the original sender to get the message twice. When replying to a
list, you hardly ever want to reply-all. On Sun, February 17, 2013 4:00 am, Chris
Bannister wrote:
> [No need to include me in the reply, I'm subscribed to the list]
Unfortunately, this list does not add a replyto: field so the only way
of getting things to the list is with reply all.... or spend time
messing with all the header fields.
I thought most email clients have supported reply-to-list based on
List-id for ages? For those, if I catch them, I start again with a
reply-all and delete all but the list normally. When I don't catch it, I end
up sending driect and not to the list. In those cases, I hopefully catch it
later and send again to the list the second time.
I have not investigated if this occurs when people cc the list instead of
having the mail sent to the list.
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html