Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 13:48:07 -0500
Jeremy <jeremybubs(a)gmail.com> escreveu:
It seems like you would want to do normal
compression with a very
low threshold (about the noise level) and a negative ratio.
then you end up with a curve like
\
/ \
/ \
Then you can add that into your original signal, to get something
approximating "upward compression".
Also, perhaps the expander from tap-plugins might do what you
want:
http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html
<http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html>Jeremy
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Fabio <capoeirista(a)arcor.de>
wrote:
> Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:09:54 +0000
> Q <lists(a)quirq.ukfsn.org> escreveu:
>
> > upwards compression does it by boosting the volume of the
> > quietest signals -- compressing from the bottom up. This
> > parallel processing produces upwards compression as Joern
> > expounded on my original statement
>
> ok, thats what i want
>
> perhaps my math is to weak...lol
>
> I simply will try it out.
>
> just giving more info: amateur-singer, half an hour of time,
> lives long from here. we recorded her voice, but in the lower
> parts she sang very quiet, so with normal compression i would
> compress 95% of what is correct only to add more gain to those
> parts. so i thought about this option instead. probably i
> should simply elevate volume in those part instead.
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
>
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
that's not possible
curve has to be like this: (hope this will be look the way it looks
like here)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
but like i said, none of the compressors i have installed can do
this (and I have a lot)