Thorsten Wilms wrote:
Ooh, you documented your problems in all detail,
posted about
them and/or filed bug reports?
Something like that, yeah (except the bug report part, reason explained
below)...
I forgot to mention that it wasn't really a problem with lash itself,
but the quickly-done lash-implementation in some of the programs I used
(and want to use), most notably specimen and zynaddsubfx.
Reason for no bug report:
Both programs are not very actively maintained, and lash support from
the users point of view is a matter of finding the right patch and
applying it to the source. This means that there's not really *one*
person to talk to, since the people maintaining the software didn't
implement the lash support and the authors of patches doesn't maintain
the software.
--
peace, love & harmony
Atte
I think Dave wrote the current lash code in specimen, so he might be
interested in reports.
Loki