Um, isn't that like, going against the GPL if they're not giving the code
back (wine/kernel patches) back to the community?
Andrew Coughlan
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Brett McCoy <idragosani(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Michael Bohle
<opendaw(a)jacklab.org>
wrote:
Not all
VSTs have equivalents on Linux, sadly, especially with regard
to virtual instruments.
We have good instruments like Hexter and so on, enough for music
production. If it
is not enough for you, start to developing other virtual
instruments. But don't look back to the proprietary shiny VST preset
wonderland, we don't need this.
I would love to develop more virtual instruments but don't have the
resources for recording orchestral instruments and choirs. It's doubly
sad that a lot of manufacturers are moving to proprietary sample
engines so you can't even migrate the samples into LinuxSampler or
similar. There are a large number of sample libraries that simply
can't be used on Linux. I'm not saying I like the situation, I'd like
to be running a 100% Linux studio, but have no choice.
-- Brett
------------------------------------------------------------
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
-- Jelaleddin Rumi
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user