20 Mar
2005
20 Mar
'05
6:46 a.m.
Hallo,
Dubphil hat gesagt: // Dubphil wrote:
Yesterday was my very first experience in live
recording under Linux.
Everything was fine during the record :
I was just using this audio chain :
Basicaly, with the help of jackd
I run TerminatorX connected to Ecasound
Ecasound is connected to AMS
AMS is connected to MuSE where I do the recording.
I just wonder: Why don't you record in ecasound? I'd say, running MuSE
just for recording could be a bit overkill. And ecasound is a really
useful and stable recording software and also very configurable.
in another way, can we imagine a system like that :
during the recording, a "hot key" could be assigned to split the
recording in a new file. So at the end we would have several files that
we could play on a playlist and work on it easily.
This would be a great feature for people like me that have more a DJ
approach to the music than other traditional musicians. this splitting
should not of course give a gap beetween the file in order to keep the
continuity of the mix. But this can be resolve by pasting the files in a
sound editor just before the burning process or perhaps even during the
burning process.
Although with the help of jack-transport it might be possible to do a
sample-exact switching of soundfiles during recording, in this case
I'd probably try to keep a bit of overlap between both files. That is,
you could run two ecasounds and start recording in one, then stop
recording in the other afterwards.
Ciao
--
Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
_ __latest track: "scans" _ http://footils.org/cms/show/41