18 Feb
2013
18 Feb
'13
9:57 p.m.
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:36 PM, <jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com> wrote:
If a better response time from the kernel is something
that's Good, why
isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
Linux Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
having a lowlatency kernel by default ?
latency and bandwidth are opposing goals. server oriented (compute-based
or storage-based) systems want to have the highest possible bandwidth, not
the lowest latency. generally, at least.