3 Apr
2013
3 Apr
'13
5:13 p.m.
On Apr 3, 2013 1:42 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf(a)alice-dsl.net>
wrote:
Playing one file after the other using VLC -> Jack @ 48KHz -> HDSPe AIO
phones out -> AKG K 240 DF I didn't notice a difference for the audio
quality. _But_ the mix of the original wav for sure is nice for that
kind of music, but it isn't a high quality audio recording useful for
this test.
Just as a matter of interest, what would be a suitable high quality
recording?
On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 13:54 +0200, Raffaele Morelli wrote:
> 2013/4/3 Peder Hedlund <peder(a)musikhuset.org>rg>:
> > In view of the recent debate regarding the alledged "crappiness" of
MP3 I
> > thought it would be fun to see if the LAU
society can tell lame
(v3.99.4)
> > MP3s from the original.
> >
> > Everyone is invited to download the testfiles from
> > http://www.musikhuset.org/~peder/AxelF.zip , see if you can ABX them
and
> > post the result.
> > There's one original WAV file and then 3 MP3s of various bitrates,
which
have all been converted back to WAV.
The 165 MP3 was created using "-V4", the 124 "-V6" and the 108
"-V8
--resample 44.1" (since it wanted to make a 24 kHz file otherwise).
- Peder
Hi,
trials 10
against 165: correct 5, p-value 0.623
against 124: correct 7, p-value 0.172
against 108: correct 9, p-value 0.011
side effects: back to the '80 and doing the moonwalk B-)