31 Oct
2003
31 Oct
'03
6:11 p.m.
Michal Seta wrote:
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 10:27, Daniel James wrote:
actually i've had editors *ahem* actually a certain magazine we both
know forget to print my license details at the bottom of my articles. i
license all my articles Free or Creative Commons 'Attribution -
Share-Alike'. if they forget to print it, thats irrelevant... because
its a typo. the form in which i submit the article is the form in which
they accepted it, and that would be upheld in a court of law. it would
just be annoying because i'd have to tell people in person that it was
Free for them to share.
m~
--
|\ _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ HTTP 503: Too Busy
|,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'
'---''(_/--' `-'\_) fL
"Do not meddle in the affairs of cats, for they are
subtle and will piss on your computer."
-- Bruce Graham
Musicians say No to RIAA Persecution and Prosecution of Music Lovers!
Sign the petition at http://www.copyleftmedia.org.uk/justsayno/
.::. www.iriXx.org .::. www.copyleftmedia.org.uk .::.
Just imagine that this record company doesn't
understand or care about
your licence, and neglects to include this information. Your only
recourse would be to sue, and that might not be practical or
affordable.
This is impossible. They all have very competent legal advisers and
can't afford not understanding or not caring. It would cost them too
much (not to mention reputation).