13 Sep
2009
13 Sep
'09
4:13 p.m.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:06:10 +0200
Grammostola Rosea <rosea.grammostola(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Atte Andre Jensen wrote:
Isn't one of those languages already able to spit out various plug-in
formats and/or at least C code? Was it csound, supercollider or chuck?
Philipp
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Thanks for searching.
In my search to an environment I got the feeling that SuperCollider
is a more modern language, a language for the future so to say. It's
better suitable to compete those VST plugins maybe...
I can see that is seems to be more easy to make a PD gui, but this
should be possible with SC too right? Don't know if the language is
ready for that yet.
Please post also a message to the SC mailinglist, then you get a more
general/objective view...
Regards,
\r why Csound backend and not SuperCollider?
I was so excited about this that I started browsing and found these:
pd:
http://www.halftheory.com/hetleveiker/pdvst.html
http://www-crca.ucsd.edu/~jsarlo/pdvst/
csound:
http://www.csounds.com/manual/html/CommandCsoundVST.html
They all seem windows-ish to me, but given the cross platform
nature of both projects, it might not be far fetched to have it
going under linux.
I asked on both the pd list and the csound list for input on the
current status of running them as native linux vst plugins, I'll
get back with any followups here.
NB: A quick google search seems suggest that super collider is not
this far in this regard (being used as vst plugin) :-(