24 Aug
2006
24 Aug
'06
6:08 p.m.
On 8/24/06, Lee Revell <rlrevell(a)joe-job.com> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 21:50 +0200, Lars Luthman
wrote:
Yes, that's a reasonable clarification on my point. Thanks for keeping
me honest.
I continue to be curious if this was the product that caused them to
change the license from GPL to non-GPL. I've never heard.
Anyone wishing to can comment back privately if they would prefer.
Cheers,
Mark
On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 12:45 -0700, Drucer
Ninetynine wrote:
Yes, it is open source (the source is avaliable - QED). It's not GPL or
free software.
Lee http://www.linuxsampler.org/
Nope, not dead :)
http://www.linuxsampler.org/downloads.html
Not open source.