On 5/29/25 06:02, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
Hi LAU and LAD,
It seems that (FLOSS) audio editors (not DAWs) are all either
dead/obsolate (mhwaveditor, rezound), in strange development states
(Audacity, Tenacity).
Tenacity, the most promising (albeit with its audacity-inherited
idiosyncrasies) has a really annoying bug [1] which makes it take ages
to load [1] - IMHO a no go for an audio editor IMHO (plus its
multi-track-ness like Audacity makes it overload for a few use cases).
The only more-or-less usable one at the moment is ocenaudio which is
not free software (and also has some UI quirks, but that's maybe
personal).
I've been a fan of mhWaveEdit for its mix of simplicity and
configurability, but as an abandoned GTK2 application it shows its
problems.
Is this kind of software not interesting any more? Are people using
DAWs for everything?
Are people even using, or interested / committed in using Linux Audio
any more?
As LAC approaches (unfortunately I won't be able to attend, even
though it's in Europe), why not try to spark some debate :-P
Why isn't Audacity being considered FLOSS on Linux?
https://github.com/audacity/audacity
I recall some controversy, but the repo still shows current activity, a
release earlier this year, and a GPL2 license.
Maybe part of the issue is some lessened demand for basic audio editing
separate from other things, like editing in a more capable DAW, editing
in a video NLE, etc?