10 Feb
2011
10 Feb
'11
10:52 a.m.
Am 09.02.2011 23:16, schrieb Philipp Überbacher:
Excerpts from Bearcat M. Sandor's message of
2011-02-09 20:49:07 +0100:
I think, a beginner will find some useful, interesting things in SND,
before the learning curve starts to become very steep. In Fact SND can
be used for many things like granular synthesis, basic filtering or
dynamics before you learn a single command for its scripting language.
But if you really want to control what is going on in SND you will have
to learn the basics of its command line interface.
On 2/9/2011 3:05 AM, Philipp Überbacher wrote:
It's hard to say because it's hard to compare those two programs. SND is
a completely scriptable graphical audio editor. Ecasound is a DAW
with a commandline interface and bindings for many programming
languages. I'm sure both can be used for pretty similar things but their
goals are different and they both have a rather steep learning curve. SND seems to be extremely powerful and flexible
but its learning curve
is insane. I just found out that it has a built-in extensive,
half-working, possibly useful help system.
There's SND-ls that aims to make SND usable by mere mortals, but I'm not
sure it achieved this goal yet:
http://archive.notam02.no/arkiv/src/snd-ls/
I've understood (though not used)
ecasound to have a lower learning
curve and be just as able as snd. Is that correct?
Bearcat M. Sandor
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user