9 Apr
2008
9 Apr
'08
7:42 a.m.
Bengt Gördén wrote:
Den Wednesday 09 April 2008 04.45.50 skrev Nick
Copeland:
Ok. Then it's best to speak up then.
It could be because of several reasons. One might be that LAU people of today
are fairly up to speed with system administration and used to fiddle around
with lots of programs. But I think that when the audio distros gets more
attention, that would result in more and more people that aren't that fluent
in technical matters and that will eventually lead to demands like LASH. I
believe that it also could be one of the factors that would make up for a
good marketing point for audio under Linux.
If there were LASH for qsynth, ardour, hydrogen, zynaddsubfx, muse and seq24 I
would definitely use it. And yes. I know that 50% of them have LASH but I
would like to see 100% :-)
/bengan
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
I'm not a dev at all... I just like to see more applications which are
using LASH... a very welcome tool in a studio which can save a lot of
'configuration' and time...
I think the best way to make lash 'populair' is using it a lot and ask
the devs of your favourite app to make lash possible! And advice other
people to use it, cause I have the idea that not many people now about
the existence of LASH....
Dirk
> So
why is there so low interest in LASH?
>
That almost answers itself. Linux Audio does not exist in a vacuum.
Most
applications respond to the demands of the users since the developers are
pushed along by necessity as much as their own interests. The demand for
LASH features has been pretty low on LAU, the one submit here and there
with a single response attest to that.