25 Dec
2010
25 Dec
'10
7:48 p.m.
It seems like you would want to do normal compression with a very low
threshold (about the noise level) and a negative ratio.
then you end up with a curve like
\
/ \
/ \
Then you can add that into your original signal, to get something
approximating "upward compression".
Also, perhaps the expander from tap-plugins might do what you want:
http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html
<http://tap-plugins.sourceforge.net/ladspa/dynamics.html>Jeremy
On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Fabio <capoeirista(a)arcor.de> wrote:
Em Sat, 25 Dec 2010 17:09:54 +0000
Q <lists(a)quirq.ukfsn.org> escreveu:
upwards compression does it by boosting the
volume of the quietest
signals -- compressing from the bottom up. This parallel processing
produces upwards compression as Joern expounded on my original
statement
ok, thats what i want
perhaps my math is to weak...lol
I simply will try it out.
just giving more info: amateur-singer, half an hour of time, lives long
from here. we recorded her voice, but in the lower parts she sang very
quiet, so with normal compression i would compress 95% of what is
correct only to add more gain to those parts. so i thought about this
option instead. probably i should simply elevate volume in those part
instead.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user