On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 5:24 AM, simone-www. io-lab. org
<cimo75(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Mark Knecht
<markknecht(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Tim Blechmann
<tim(a)klingt.org> wrote:
Is anyone
interested in an Open Source MIDI control surface?
interesting thread as i am working on a control-surface myself atm ... i
would be curious, if someone has some experience with higher-precision
adc? most io boards i know (arduino/makingthings) provide 10-bit adcs,
while i'd be interested in getting a higher resolution ... does anyone
have experience with interfacing a microcontroller (e.g. arduino) with an
external high-resolution adc?
thnx, tim
--
tim(a)klingt.org
http://tim.klingt.org
Just for my own understanding isn't MIDI fundamentally an 8-bit
system? (256 max notes across a keyboard, 256 max levels, etc., ...)
If so why would anything above 8-bits make any difference? Or can you
specifically send controller information over multiple MIDI bytes?
MIDI rpn/nrpn messages combine 2 midi cc parameters to get double
resolution, 14 bit.
Thanks.
The answer to your question is that many of us are not
using MIDI at
all to receive data from sensors or whatsoever, programs like Pure
Data can receive any kind of numbers over different protocols (HID,
OSC etc etc) so no need to get int o the MIDI bottleneck resolution.
No, this was not my question. My question was answered above.
thanks,
Mark
Simone
Thanks,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user
--
.wmv , .wma , .pps along with all proprietary Windows formats won t be
accepted and/or viewed....
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-user