7 Sep
2005
7 Sep
'05
2:34 a.m.
On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 20:51 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 01:36 +0200, Michael Rudolf
wrote:
He probably just got the impression that all non-firewire RME stuff was
well supported under Linux. That's what I thought...
How exactly does the hardware design not play nice with ALSA? Does it
need variable period sizes to do low latency? It seems like the ASIO
drivers must be able to do < 3-5 ms on Windows or it would not be
marketable...
Lee
I bought an RME Digi96/8 PST because it was said
to have good Linux support
and very low latency, therefore perfectly suitable for hd-recording and
the like.
where does it say this? the digi96/8 is an entirely different product
(different h/w design, different chipset, different interactions with
the host CPU) from the digi9652, HDSP and HDSP9652 systems. this latter
range is well supported and works exceedingly well on almost all
systems. the digi96/8 has support, but it does not work particularly
well, especially not for low latency work (this is not because of the
driver design (other than the overall way that ALSA works), but because
of the h/w design).