18 Feb
2013
18 Feb
'13
9:43 p.m.
Il 18/02/2013 21:36, jonetsu(a)teksavvy.com ha scritto:
If a better response time from the kernel is something
that's Good, why
isn't lowlatency kernels a default in Linux distros (well, at least in
Linux Mint and Fedora) If it is So Good, what are the arguments for not
having a lowlatency kernel by default ? Any drawbacks ? I presume the
Audio-oriented Linux distros do have lowlatency kernels by default, do
they ?
You can find some information here:
http://www.jackaudio.org/realtime_vs_realtime_kernel
I don't use a RT kernel, I manage to get good low latency with the
hardware I have.
--
Federico