21 Apr
2007
21 Apr
'07
1:35 p.m.
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 08:04:43AM -0700, Mike Taht wrote:
I have spent the last year recording extensively at
96khz. There are only
three real features of 96khz recording that I notice:
1) Stereo imaging seems slightly better
2) Mixing it is much easier, much more headroom, I haven't used a compressor
in ages
3) Recording low volume (environmental) sounds sounds much better.
This looks more like your 44.1 or 48kHz HW having problems than any
inherent advantage of 96 kHz.
--
FA
Follie! Follie! Delirio vano รจ questo !