12 Sep
2005
12 Sep
'05
11:03 a.m.
"Joseph Dell'Orfano" <fullgo(a)dellorfano.net> writes:
I am looking for some engineering know-how and advice.
Then you should check out:
irc://irc.homelien.no/%23musicdsp (efnet) and it's mailinglist music-dsp.
Also check out the rec.audio.pro newsgroup.
Many enthusiasts and recording engineers there
Should I track at 44.1 kHz, 48 kHz or 96 kHz?
The higher the better. Even with 192kHz you're not creating a correct
digital representation of the analog signal. Nyquist says 2 times the
highest frequency, but this still has some problems.
recording his album at 44.1 kHz, arguing that this
will avoid
downsampling when finally pressing a CD.
Sure, but this shouldn't stop you creating the best possible fidelity
in your recordings.
I am contemplating the addition of an outboard digital
effects
processor to take some load off my CPU.
Not advisable; rather invest in processing power where you can use
free software algorithms.
Most units (less than $1000) with s/pdif are 44.1 and
48 kHz, so
they would not work (I don´t think) with digital audio recorded at
96 kHz.
Another reason to stay away.
--
Esben Stien is b0ef@e s a
http://www. s t n m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23contact
[sip|iax]: e e
jid:b0ef@ n n