18 May
2007
18 May
'07
9:51 a.m.
On 5/17/07, James <everamzah(a)gmail.com> wrote:
i second that. i have been going thru a lot of source
code (i have it all on
my hd anyway, so might as well) in the hopes of picking up on how to
program. strange place to start i know. but important programs like ghostess
(which i realize isn't meant to be a full-blown dssi host, but is the best
"simple" option atm) really need to be lash compliant in order to be fully
usable.
of course, a wishlist could go on for ages so i'll stfu ;)
On 5/17/07, James Stone <jamesmstone(a)gmail.com > wrote:
--
james/everamzah
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user
I've been meaning to take a crack at it as a way of learning LASH (so
I can add suport to my own project). I'll try to take a look at it in
the next few weeks, although my time is very limited.
I'd also like to change the GUI to use a GtkTreeView (useing the
ListStore), so it looks like a list of plugins, one per line.
Double-clicking the line would bring up the plugin's GUI.
Just wondered if anyone has considered adding
Lash compatibility
to ghostess? It would really make seq24 an even more amazing
program than it is already....
It is a shame more linux audio apps have not picked up on lash.
IMHO it is one of the key things preventing linux audio from
steaming ahead of the competition..
I would be more than happy to put in time to help with this, if
there is anything I can do.. I am afraid my c skills are rather
poor though, and I would not know where to start with this,
unless someone could point me to some nice example code!
Anyway, please don't read this post as moaning. It is just
written with the earnest hope of improving the situation with
linux audio.
James
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/linux-audio-user