14 Jun
2011
14 Jun
'11
1:44 p.m.
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 02:11 -0500, Aaron Krister Johnson wrote:
Hey all,
So the continuing saga is this: still no luck getting Pianoteq with
JACK to equal or spank with superiority the performance of PianoTeq
w/ALSA alone on my system.....
I found the following information: the info from the /proc/asound
output that Paul asked me to check out confirmed that at comparable
settings, JACK choked where ALSA smoked. I had ALSA down to a period
of 64 and 3 periods/buffer (hardware bufsize of 192) at a sample rate
of 48000. The same setting of jackd ('jackd -dalsa -dhw:0,0 -r48000
-p64 -n3 -S') didn't agree with Pianoteq....
So...here's my dilemma. I have a live show coming up where I'd prefer
to use the superior harpsichord sound of Pianoteq, but I don't want to
risk a lock-up or xruns or worse in a live concert. So I would have to
use ALSA...BUT....I also need to switch to playing a live kalimba
through some Csound effects right after playing a harpsichord, and
Pianoteq under ALSA will not stand for another app opening and sharing
the soundcard like JACK will allow (ALSA will block I/O).
So what can I do?
You won't use a non-tailor-made non-super-computer for
- recording an orchestra, when you need to pay the studio hall, the
recording van, the orchestra, the catering etc.
- even when you do an amateur live performance
A complete studio in the box could cost less than 1000,- EUR. What do
you think, why people still buy stand-alone-devices that provide just
e.g. some piano instruments for much more than 1000,- EUR?
If Pianoteq is the only problematic thing on your machine, regarding to
a live performance, than you've got good luck.
Sorry, no help, but try to see it that way, you should be lucky to have
such a reliable machine.
2 Cents,
Ralf