31 Dec
2009
31 Dec
'09
10:15 a.m.
Well the reason for why I'd like to develope tX is its midi capabilities
and the workflow.
I want to use it as a sampler triggered by an external sequencer, and
not actually as a DJ-proggy. I dont know how good the midi capabilities
of Mixx are.
In general Mixxx and tX are incomparable, since Mixxx only allows for 2
turntables, or am I wrong?
Gerald
On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 00:20 +0100, Dubphil wrote:
rosea grammostola a écrit , Le 30.12.2009 22:53:
gerald mwangi wrote:
Mixxx hasn't the same scratch taste, Tx scratch effect is really
amazing, I don't know why...
IMHO It would be nice to make it survive, but personnaly I don't need
the Ableton feature :)
Regards
Philippe
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user OK, I'll start to work on it, but it will
take some time.
Maybe someone has experience with librubberband?
Gerald
Is it really a good idea to spend time on TerminatorX? Couldn't you
better add 'Abbleton features' to mixxx, hydrogen or non-sequencer/daw?
It looks to me those apps have more potential to survive.
I could be wrong though.
Regards,
\r