Paul Coccoli wrote:
On 11/2/07, david <gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com> wrote:
Paul Davis wrote:
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 08:27 -0700, william
estrada wrote:
> Hi group,
>
> I wish to thanks all of you for the responses about 'better mics'.
> I think I need to clarify what I am looking for.
>
> I'm writing a suite of programs to be used for a 'Voice Messaging
> System'. The system will be used during field events where communication
> from PC to PC will take place. There by the need for inexpensive hardware.
> We are dealing with cheap HAMs here after all! So supplying everyone with
> a mic is going to be costly to begin with. A preamp, which is the best
> solution, will be too costly. So I need to build a software fix.
I think what
you need is to use cheap computer mics, not music-quality
ones, that should only need to plug in to an 1/8th-inch audio in
connection on a sound card. I don't think those kinds of mics require a
preamp of any kind.
Yes, they do. The preamp is built-in to any soundcard with a "mic"
input. A sound card mic input will be high impedance (a.k.a. Hi-Z)
and have an amplifier (called a preamp in this case) on it in order to
bring the signal up to line level (before it hits the ADC).
I should've thought of that. What about those computers that have mics
built in to them?
But I agree that is what the OP wants, assuming the
computers in
question will have mic inputs (I think most motherboards have them
integrated these days).
The assorted desktop PCs around here all have mic inputs. So does my
Toshiba laptop. With the popularity of Internet telephony like Skype and
Vonage, I suspect it's probably almost mandatory in laptops now.
--
David
gnome(a)hawaii.rr.com
authenticity, honesty, community