12 Feb
2011
12 Feb
'11
12:44 p.m.
Am 12.02.2011 11:07, schrieb Robert Jonsson:
2011/2/12 Hartmut
Noack<zettberlin(a)linuxuse.de>de>:
No offence ment but what 1.6 GHz/1GB RAM machine is that?
I had Seq24 running on a Toshiba Laptop with 1GHz PIII and 256RAM and it was
running perfectly OK. A collegue used it professionally on a 800 MHz Celeron
with 256 RAM.
I'd have to agree with that, most old sk00l linux sequencers should
really have no problem on an 1.6Ghz machine.
Now I remember: I had it even running in a usable manner on my archaic
Dell Latitude with 500MHz PII/128 RAM.
Gave my very first public talk on Jack with introducing Rezound and Muse
with that Laptop ;-)
Am 12.02.2011 00:12, schrieb Ken Restivo:
<...>
Seq24 fits your description 1:1.
Thanks. I used it successfully for years on a 64-bit 2.33Ghz Intel PC with
2GB RAM, but it is unusably slow on a 1.6Ghz 32-bit Intel PC with 1GB RAM. This thread woke old memories of trying to create
music in a linux
environment ten years ago and the trials and tribulations you had to
go through.
I also check the Jazz++ Site from time to time to see if there is
something new.
Anybody out there remembering Slab?
http://www.llornkcor.com/SLab/SLab.html
We've definitely come long way, though there is
always ways to go.
I recall having a Pentium II Celeron 300A (likely overclocked) at that
time which I was running MusE under, midi was never a problem, could
only run a few audio tracks though.
Regards,
Robert
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user(a)lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user