10 Mar
2005
10 Mar
'05
5:21 p.m.
On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 20:23 +0000, Iain Young wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:22:00PM -0500, Lee Revell
wrote:
OK. They do worry some users. Really this was just an FYI that you can
use the RT preempt patch with 2.6.11. If this one reject does not
bother you then you can just apply Ingo's patch.
Apply this tiny patch (yes it's a patch
against another patch) to Ingo's
latest RT preempt patch to get it to apply against the 2.6.11 release.
This was reported on LKML to work fine.
Looking at this, it just prevents a hunk of Makefile failing, thus getting
the patch to apply cleanly ? Am I correct, or missing something ? I only
ask because I add other patches to mainline, and have my own EXTRAVERSION
defined, so hunk failures of this nature don't overly worry me.
Second, what is the patch order needed on 2.6.11
mainline ? Is it still
mm(1 or 2?), then ingo's RT patch, then this patch I assume ?
No, the -mm step is no longer needed. Get 2.6.11, then apply my patch
to Ingo's patch (or don't, if you do not care about "uname -r" being
correct), then apply Ingo's patch.
Lee