7 Jan
2011
7 Jan
'11
10:18 p.m.
On 01/07/2011 10:03 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
On 01/07/2011 09:44 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Or it should be a special repo for the kernel... Then updates
should be
possible.
\r
On 01/07/2011 09:34 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
It is not released yet and there's no ETA.
On 01/07/2011 09:22 PM, rosea.grammostola wrote:
Ok, I'm interested in your view about that
kernel. On 01/07/2011 09:15 PM, Robin Gareus wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 01/07/2011 08:56 PM, Jeremy Jongepier wrote:
>> On 01/07/2011 08:14 PM, Josh Lawrence wrote:
>>> in addition to Robin's suggestions, I'll add one more to the mix:
>>> AVLinux uses this kernel, I dunno if it is a true -rt kernel, but my
>>> results have been very positive:
>>>
>>> http://liquorix.net/
>>>
>>> ymmv. my initial reaction would be to trust the 64 studio kernel
>>> over
>>> all of the suggestions, just b/c they are familiar with the linux
>>> audio landscape.
>> The liquorix kernel is not a RT kernel. And I tried the 64 Studio
>> kernel, had to change the apt line though:
>>
>> deb http://apt.64studio.com/backports squeeze-backports main contrib
>> non-free
Is there also a 64studio RT kernel for Lucid?
No, although there's some minor
effort for Maverick.
Previously we did -rt kernel packages for i386, i686 and amd64.
Currently we're focusing on amd64 and squeeze only. That may change
again in the not-too-distant future once 2.6.37-rt is out.
Depending on pengutronix' config for 2.6.37-rt we may also just join
Uwe Kleine-König's endeavour. Is it good practice to install a debian kernel
for Lucid?
It should not make a difference. The only thing is you won't get
automatic updates.