23 Apr
2006
23 Apr
'06
4:17 p.m.
On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 14:09 -0400, Paul Winkler wrote:
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 04:50:44AM -0400, Eric Dantan
Rzewnicki wrote:
And the insanely long anonymous CVS lag.
-DR-
Gene Heskett wrote:
My experience with sourceforge leads me to tentatively conclude:
If you have a low-priority project that you work on intermittently,
with maybe a few other developers, and you don't want to bother with
setting up any infrastructure (i.e. public repositories and trackers),
it's very very useful. I'm involved with a couple of projects like
this.
If you live and breathe some particular project(s), you *will* get bit
by sourceforge service outages and the inability to really tweak the
infrastructure to your needs. On Thursday 20 April 2006 16:01, Lee Revell
wrote:
There are reasons jackaudio.org and ardour.org now exist. As I
understand it, sourceforge's persistent cvs access difficulties played
no small part in those moves. On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:51 -0400, Dana Olson
wrote:
>SourceForge is pretty reliable, and I don't see it going
>down any time soon
LOL
I wonder what Dana has been smoking? If I still smoked, I'd like to
sample that. I know of one project that left in the last month, mainly
because cvs only worked a few hours a week. Life's too short for that
BS.