On Tuesday 10 April 2007, Dave Robillard wrote:
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 21:52 +0100, Gordon JC
Pearce wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 10:36 +0300, David Baron
wrote:
Is it really necessary? Can we say the same thing
in a nicer manner?
Maybe a hundred posts one after another: That must suck, et al. I think
folks of our intelligence and talent can do better.
Since when is "suck" classed as "foul language"?
Heh, no kidding... this thread is just hilarious. All this over
"sucks"!
Wow, guys. Just.... wow.
-DR-
P.S. This thread sucks
It reminds me of my highschool year in the U.S. When parents and children were
together no one used any "foul language", but when each of them were on their
own, all you would hear was "fuck", "shit", "damn", and
"suck", regularly
used in normal conversation (though i have to admit that the kids used them a
little more often than the parents).
I often had to laugh about this :) It seemed so silly to me.
My friends loved coming over to my place because my mom swore and
belched and let them too. You're right, it is silly.
-Chuckk
"Ever tell your kids you're glad that they can think?
Ever say you love them, ever let them watch you drink?"
-Frank Zappa
--